Old West Had Stricter Gun Control Laws Than We Do Today

Tombstone Gun LawsSince the extreme proponents of the “Open Carry” gun laws want to openly carry and flaunt their guns anytime and anywhere they go, I’m sure a lot of them are fantasizing about the good Old Wild-West days when every man carried a gun, without any gun control or rules. Once again a little research into history will burst their ignorant bubble.

Even in the Old West the citizens didn’t want everyone walking the streets of their towns packing a gun. They had first-hand experience with what this causes – violence and death. Even then there were reasonable people who were smart enough to know that gun control was the only answer to the problem. Many of the large Old West cities passed laws restricting, and in some cases outright banning, carrying guns. In many frontier cities, the law required those entering town to turn their guns over to the sheriff. In the Dodge City of 1879, a large billboard announced to residents and visitors alike “The Carrying of Firearms Strictly Prohibited.”

Tombstone’s infamous “Gunfight at the empty lot near Fremont Street” — later dubbed the “Gunfight at the OK Corral,” which was nearby, for marketing reasons — developed precisely because the Earp brothers were trying to enforce the law against carrying firearms in town, which the Clantons were flouting.

As history shows, gun control laws were actually put in place prior to the Old West. A brief history of gun control laws:

  • In 1813, Kentucky enacted the first carrying concealed weapon statute in the United States.
  • In 1837, Georgia completely banned the sale of pistols
  • In the early to mid-1800’s Indiana, Alabama and Arkansas all had concealed carry laws
  • In 1911 New York City passed the Sullivan Act
  • The 1920’s and 1930’s saw many states imposing “A Uniform Act to Regulate the Sale and Possession of Firearms,” which prohibited unlicensed carrying and possession
  • The National Firearms Act was imposed in 1934
  • The assassinations of JFK, Bobby Kennedy, and the Reverend Martin Luther King were the prime motivations behind the passage of the Gun Control Act of 1968
  • And more…

So how did we get to this point where we have regressed to be worse than it was even prior to the Old West? I guess America’s love for our guns and our right to openly carry them anywhere, anytime, apparently trumps everyone else’s rights to not be exposed to this nonsense.

I’m just waiting for the “Gunfight at McDonalds” to erupt…






4 thoughts on “Old West Had Stricter Gun Control Laws Than We Do Today

  1. Interesting article, but there are a few things that need to be said. First, gun laws in the Old West were local – most weren’t even state wide. Anybody back then trying to pass things like a national gun registry would have been tarred and feathered. Once you left the town where there were no-carry ordinances, in most cases you were free to carry. Second, the Gunfight at the OK Corral (which did happen on Fremont street as you correctly point out) wasn’t about violation of open carry laws. It was more of an organized crime war, as was the vendetta that followed. This was more like Al Capone and Bugs Moran fighting it out. That doesn’t play well in movies where you want one side to be the hero.

  2. Oh, and I should add that I’m generally against open carry laws, but against national gun registries, outlawing classes of guns because of what they look like, and so on. The 2nd Amendment exists to be a check on government power over the individual. If we lose that, our rights under the other parts of the Bill of Rights will disappear as well. Our government is already chipping away at the 1st and 4th amendments as we speak.

  3. If you do some research you might find that a lot of restrictive laws in the 19th century were brazenly based on racism, either against negroes or immigrant Irish.

    See this article by Clayton Cramer:

    The Racist Roots of Gun Control

    Now I think just about every state has some form of legal concealed carry. From what I have read those who, like me, get a concealed carry permit or license are some of the most law abiding citizens in the country. They may get arrested for a firearms violation, but no more often than sworn police officers getting arrested for a firearms violation. Just doesn’t happen that often.

    Legal concealed carry is nothing like what many imagine the “Wild West” to have been (and their idea is as I think you make the point to some degree, more based on movies than history).



    • Wow where to begin, it’s sometimes quite difficult to address topics that seem to lack or miss some very basic conclusions or explanations. I have heard all the gun control arguments, Ive even heard this one. Even though you can pop out with a few examples, that hardly constitutes the ridiculous title, Ill never understand people that make erroneous conclusions based on a few minimal examples of something barely related. they weren’t stricter, and they weren’t common. And passing them as a city ordinance doesn’t make them any less Unconstitutional.
      No one was stopping them from owning a gun, oh and remind us again what started the shootout in Tombstone? Oh ya the bad guys still had their guns, gee I guess that worked out well.
      Aside from the mountains of evidence showing stricter gun control laws dont make safer streets or cities, and I’m sure you’ve seen them as well, but there are so many other problems with not only your premise, but your understanding of the need for the right to bear arms. It has less to do with protection in the streets although it does that well too, and much more to do with a government gone wrong, and a well regulated militia, is the best way to assure your countries security. I think a mandatory 2 year stint in the service is a pretty good idea too. Maybe you could ask Mr. Daly why Chicago with some of the strictest gun laws has the worst crime and murder rate

      I guess my real problem with much of what you claim is the giant leap you take with verbiage. Claiming they have less burdensome laws and that the residents were all clamoring for gun control is a complete farce. These were city ordinances orchestrated and passed by the Earps. with conceal and carry written in. It was also by the way illegal and against the State Constitution. During the pre-statehood 1910 constitutional convention, Arizona’s founders included a special protection for individual gun rights in the state constitution that went beyond the language of even the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

      Time and time again you take liberties with information that simply doesn’t exist. trying to claim city ord. number 9 curbed violence and kept murder rates down. You fail to not only note murder rates were always low there, except for one period of time, that’s when the Earps and the cowboys were going at it over this illegal city ordinance. A lot of what you twisted in this article to fit your narrative is disingenuous at best. Especially using the term gun violence and then using stats for murder rates as if they were synonymous. The year I think before the ordinance was passed the murders were committed with a rock and a mug. You also failed to make any kind of distinction between towns, which might be causing the disparage, mining town, cattle town, there’s a difference and possible reason for more violence in mining towns.
      You simply applied everything shined because of a no carry in town policy. If anything it lead to more and the worst that city had ever seen.
      And trying to ignore the fact that gun sales are the highest ever seen and murder rates the lowest, kind of contradicts most of your theory about control. So does
      that most big cities with strict a many gun restrictions have the worst rates. I’m really trying to figure out why the left is sooo voracious about this, since it cant be concern for murder rates, or you’d try other things, the least of which listen to the facts, oh and maybe focus penalizing and stopping the people committing crimes not punishing law abiding citizens by lessoning their rights.

      Sorry sir, I tried to give you the benefit of the doubt. but I have seen tactics like this before and the disregard for more specifics and making some pretty erroneous claims without them never turns out well. And by the way, there is no battle for the right to bear arms, it is my right endowed by my creator. It is inalienable, and shall not be infringed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s